Understanding LTS vs. STS in .NET: Choosing the Right Support Model for Your Project

As a key player in the .NET software development, your role in choosing the right support model is pivotal. The decision between Long-Term Support (LTS) for stability and Short-Term Support (STS) for innovation can significantly impact your team’s efficiency, budget, and overall project success. Both options have distinct advantages, and your informed choice is crucial.


This blog is designed to provide practical guidance on the differences between LTS and STS in .NET, key factors to consider, and insights from real-world examples. By the end, you'll feel confident in your ability to choose the best support model for your next .NET project.



What Are LTS and STS in .NET?


LTS (Long-Term Support) 

LTS releases offer stability and extended support. They receive critical updates such as bug fixes and security patches for several years, making them ideal for projects where predictability and reduced maintenance overhead are crucial.


Duration of Support: 

Typically supported for 3+ years. 


Release Frequency: 

New LTS releases come approximately every two years. 


Ideal For: 

Applications requiring long-term reliability without frequent need for updates. 



STS (Short-Term Support) 

STS releases prioritize rapid innovation and frequent updates. They allow developers to work with the latest .NET features, but the support is short-lived compared to LTS.


Duration of Support: 

Around 18 months or less. 


Release Frequency: 

Released frequently, often alongside major iterations of .NET. 


Ideal For: 

Projects that demand cutting-edge functionality and flexibility.


Factors to Consider When Choosing LTS or STS for Your Project 


Project Requirements 

Start by analyzing your project goals. Is the application customer-facing and expected to be stable over the years? Or is it an internal project where flexibility and rapid iteration are key? 


1. LTS is the go-to for enterprise-grade solutions requiring long-term maintenance. 


2. STS works well for startups or short-term development initiatives that aim to explore innovative features. 


Team Capabilities 

The level of expertise within the development Team plays a significant role. Supporting STS can require frequent updates and a strong ability to pivot quickly when features are depreciated. 

If your Team prefers a predictable environment with fewer updates, LTS is the safer choice. STS may be better suited to teams that are comfortable with rapid iteration and experimentation. 


Vendor Support 

Vendor-provided support (e.g., Microsoft support) guarantees timely updates and a safety net for resolving critical issues. Evaluate whether long-term stability (LTS) or quick feature implementation (STS) aligns with your vendor-support expectations. 



Case Studies and Real-World Examples 


Company A’s Migration to .NET Core LTS 


Scenario: 

A large financial services firm needed to modernize its legacy systems while ensuring compliance with strict security regulations. 


Solution: 

They opted for .NET Core LTS for its extended support window and minimized disruption to end users. 


Outcome:

1. Enhanced system reliability with fewer disruptions. 

2. Simplified maintenance cycle, reducing Team workload. 

3. Avoided the resource-intensive process required for frequent updates. 


Lesson Learned: 

LTS is ideal for critical systems where unplanned change can lead to service interruptions and security risks.


Project B’s Adoption of .NET Core STS 


Scenario: 

A startup developing a SaaS product chose .NET Core STS to stay competitive and integrate the latest features. 


Solution: 

Leveraged STS for rapid development cycles and to experiment with new functionality. 


Outcome:

1. Accelerated delivery of innovative features to end-users. 


2. Managed challenges in regularly updating the codebase by allocating specific developer resources for maintaining updates. 


Lesson Learned: 

While STS enabled innovation, it required a proactive approach to keep up with new releases. 



Open-Source Community Projects 

Analyzing community-driven .NET projects highlights a balanced split:


1. LTS for foundational frameworks and extensive projects backed by volunteer contributors.

2. STS for agile, experimental libraries seeking community feedback quickly.


Best Practices for .NET Projects


Align Your Support Model with Your Needs 

1. If prioritizing stability, Go for LTS.   

2. If focused on innovation, Choose STS. 


Plan for Updates 

Even with LTS, significant upgrades (e.g., switching from .NET Core 3.1 to .NET 6) require preparation. Always allocate time and resources for transition. 


Monitor the Lifecycle 

Stay informed about Microsoft's .NET lifecycle updates to ensure your projects don’t fall out of support. 


Collaborate with Vendors 

Evaluate how Microsoft or other vendors can assist in maintaining your chosen support model—especially if unexpected issues arise! 


Consult the Community 

The .NET developer community is rich with knowledge. Leverage forums, GitHub discussions, and foundation blogs when considering migration or updates. 



Making the Right Choice for Your .NET Projects 

Picking between LTS and STS in .NET isn’t just about support windows—it’s about aligning your choice with your project's goals, team dynamics, and long-term vision for your software.


Whether you’re an enterprise leader managing stable systems or a developer experimenting with innovation, there’s a path forward. Thoughtful planning and collaboration will allow your Team to maximize the benefits of whichever support model you choose. 


Looking for more guidance on .NET development, migration, or support models? Stay ahead of the curve by connecting with our dedicated .NET consultants or exploring Microsoft’s detailed .NET roadmap. 

Comments 0

contact.webp

SCHEDULE MEETING

Schedule A Custom 20 Min Consultation

Contact us today to schedule a free, 20-minute call to learn how DotNet Expert Solutions can help you revolutionize the way your company conducts business.

Schedule Meeting paperplane.webp